What Do You Think About Occupy Wall Street?

The protesters of Occupy Wall Street were evicted from New York's Zuccotti Park early Tuesday morning. But was it justified?

What Do You Think About Occupy Wall Street?

The protesters of Occupy Wall Street were evicted from New York’s Zuccotti Park early Tuesday morning. But was it justified?

-Lucia Peters

Occupy Wall Street

Even if you don’t live in New York, odds are you’ve been following the Occupy Wall Street movement. Geared towards speaking out about the corporate influence on democracy, the growing disparity in wealth, and the lack of legal repercussions behind the global financial crisis, the movement began on September 17 when protesters moved into Zuccotti Park in New York’s financial district. Members of the Canadian group the Adbusters Foundation were the first to suggest the protest; hacker group Anonymous then took up the banner and urged on their website, “On the 17th of September, we want to see 20,000 people to flood into lower Manhattan, set up beds, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months.”

Why did they settle in Zuccotti Park? In addition to mimicking the Tahrir Square protests in Egypt, it’s private property, making it illegal for the cops to force them to leave without the owner’s say-so. Mayor Michael Bloomberg said during a press conference shortly after the protest began, “People have a right to protest, and if they want to protest, we’ll be happy to make sure they have locations to do it. As long as they do it where other people’s rights are respected, this is the place where people can speak their minds, and that’s what makes New York New York.

And so it went. “We are the 99%” entered the cultural lexicon, and the movement grew as more protesters set up camp in Zuccoti Park. The protesters weathered the snowstorm in October (which, by the way, is the first time I can remember there being snow that early in New York in recent years). Celebrities like Penn Badgely and Tim Robbins even joined up. The movement, however, was noted for its lack of organization as well as the fact that it seemed to have no specific demands, and as such, it saw much criticism.

Read Former First Daughter at Work: Chelsea Clinton Joins NBC News

And as of the wee hours of the morning on Tuesday, the cops moved in and forcefully evicted all of the protesters from Zuccotti Park. Bloomburg seemed to have changed his tune; he defended the decision to clear the park by saying, “New York City is the city where you can come and express yourself. What was happening in Zuccotti Park was not that.” He went on to say that the protesters had taken over the park, “making it unavailable to anyone else.”

But here’s the thing: The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” We’re legally entitled to peacefully protest, and it looks like this right was pretty severely violated when the cops moved in—especially in the WAY that they moved in. Check out the timeline of police action here. Overkill for a peaceful protest? Pretty clearly yes. Furthermore, rather a lot of journalists were detained, arrested, and cuffed as they tried to cover the eviction. So much for freedom of the press.

Later on Tuesday afternoon, a judge ruled that the cops were within their rights to enforce the no-camping-gear/sleeping-in-the-park rule, but that the protesters were within their rights to, well, protest. The protesters have since been let back into the park with the understanding that they cannot under any circumstances sleep there.

Was the movement all that effective? I don’t really know. But does that justify the violation of all those rights that happened during the eviction? My gut says no. All in all, though, I’m pretty conflicted about the whole thing. So I’d like to open up the floor here. What do you think about Occupy Wall Street, Bettys? Are you pro? Anti? Neutral? Should the cops have moved in like they did? What about the whole freedom of speech/protest/press issue? Tell us what you think!

Lucia Peters is BettyConfidential’s associate editor.

Photo Source

follow BettyConfidential on... Pinterest

Read More About...
Related Articles...

0 thoughts on “What Do You Think About Occupy Wall Street?

  1. As someone who lives around the corner from the park now, and for the past seven years, I completely disagree with the movement. They are completely unproductive. You say they are peaceful but the level of crime has risen dramatically since the ‘Occupation’ maybe in the beginning the people there were part of a movement but it’s become a breeding ground for thugs, drug addicts, homeless, etc. The mayor ordered the police to remove the protesters at the behest of Brookfield Properties, the owner of the park, because aside from the criminal activities, it had become a fire hazard and a health hazard for the general public and first responders. This is America and freedom of speech is one of the rights I take seriously but it is a limited right in that you cannot infringe on others via it. We all know you can’t yell fire in a crowded theater if there isn’t one and claim freedom of speech. This is analogous to the situation that has become of Zuccotti. Many protesters are vandalizing an area that is finally thriving. They should take their protest to the White House or Fannie May and Freddie Mac. The private sector is just that – private. We live in a capitalist society and while it’s not perfect, it’s better than the options that the movement is pushing – communism, socialism, and generally anarchy. Every NYers tax dollars are going towards handling the protesters instead of other needs – education, the elderly, and the disabled. How about these people stop playing 1960s protester, grow up and go get jobs like the rest of us?

Leave a Reply

top of page jump to top