Sarah Palin Bites Back at Ashley Judd
Who's really crying wolf?


Updated on May 18, 2011, 5:11 pm ET

In the News

Ashley Judd Sarah PalinA few days ago the organization Defenders of Wildlife launched a video of Ashley Judd decrying Sarah Palin's advocacy of aerial wolf-hunting. The video is part of a campaign "dedicated to exposing Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's anti-conservation agenda."

Now, Sarah Palin is firing back. In a statement released yesterday, the woman oft-referred-to as "Caribou Barbie" declared Defenders of Wildlife an "extreme fringe group" and chastised them for "twisting the truth" and trying to raise money for their cause from cash-strapped Americans.

"The ad campaign by this extreme fringe group, as Alaskans have witnessed over the last several years, distorts the facts about Alaska's wildlife management programs.

"Alaskans depend on wildlife for food and cultural practices which can't be sustained when predators are allowed to decimate moose and caribou populations. Our predator control programs are scientific and successful at protecting vulnerable wildlife.

"Shame on the Defenders of Wildlife for twisting the truth in an effort to raise funds from innocent and hard-pressed Americans struggling with these rough economic times."

It's no secret that Sarah Palin isn't the biggest supporter of environmentalist causes - she recently redoubled her efforts to open up the Alaskan Wildlife Refuge to oil-drilling. But is this wolf-hunting actually a necessary evil to keep the population under control and things in balance?

According to the Defenders of Wildlife's anti-Palin site EyeonPalin.org, "Palin offered a $150 bounty for wolves to entice hunters to kill more wolves in certain parts of the state, with hunters having to present a wolf's foreleg to collect the bounty." They also dispute Palin's claim that she supports "predator management" via aerial-hunting because "Alaskans need to hunt for food" - if that's true, they ask, then why are sportspeople the ones who support wolf-hunting and not advocates for the poor and hungry? And why are out-of-state hunters allowed to compete with Alaskan hunters for the "food?"

Those sound like good questions to me. But what I really want to know is ... why Ashley Judd?


Share this Article...
    

follow BettyConfidential on...


More from BettyTV...more BettyTV

Partners...

K S
#1. K S on 02/05/2009 - 11:17 am (EST)
When I saw the unflattering picture of Governor Palin and the flattering picture of Ashley Judd, I knew how "balanced" this piece would be.
CM-JJordan
#2. CM-JJordan on 02/05/2009 - 1:09 pm (EST)
K S - both sides of the story are presented, so it IS balanced. Honestly, Sarah Palin IS the one in the wrong. If the wolf slaughter is for Alaskans to have food, then WHY are out-of-state hunters allowed to compete? Also, aren't there other protein alternatives such as tofu, avocado, beans, etc. that they could eat instead? April is just presenting the information from her point of view, which is what writing an article is all about.
K S
#3. K S on 02/05/2009 - 1:55 pm (EST)
I agree that it's April's point of view. More information on the State of Alaska's position is available on its website.

As I understand it, wolves were decimating the numbers of caribou, moose, and deer. Those who hunt the predatory wolves allow the caribou, moose, and deer populations to expand. So, why would it matter where the wolf hunters come from?

Of course there are protein alternatives, but what is your point? Allow wolves to kill even more prey? Maybe young caribou would prefer to be killed with a bullet than ripped apart by a wolf.

Personally, I don't eat beef, but I don't want to impose my views about not slaughtering cows on others.
CM-JJordan
#4. CM-JJordan on 02/05/2009 - 2:10 pm (EST)
My views on the predatory issue are that humans should let nature happen on its own. Humans feel it's "their responsibilty" to "save" these animals who are prey, they still decide to kill wolves and other animals for their own food. The hypocrisy is infuriating.
forensicmommy
#5. forensicmommy on 02/05/2009 - 5:16 pm (EST)
KS,

I'm with you 100%. And yes, they could have used a more flattering picture of Gov. Palin as she is gorgeous and just as attractive as Miss. Judd. I am a former Alaskan and appreciate the fight Gov. Palin had/has on her hands. And I am a supporter of hers. I understand all about predation and know that it is meant to sustain future wolf populations as well as moose and caribou. Having said that, I will not however get into any cat fights about who is right or hypocritical. I am not trying to change anyone's mind or position. We ALL have a right to our opinions and they should be respected. By the way, you should try moose steaks. A native Eskimo family was so kind as to invite me over to dinner one day and shared some with me. Yummy!
CM-JJordan
#6. CM-JJordan on 02/05/2009 - 6:40 pm (EST)
I wasn't calling K S hypocritical. I was referring to Alaska's idea of "saving" the prey while Alaska makes wolves their own prey, which is a valid point. I wasn't trying to have a "cat fight" either. I was simply trying to have an intelligent debate with another intelligent woman. Debates bring ideas to the attention of both parties, so they can both learn.
C_OConnell
#7. C_OConnell on 02/05/2009 - 10:30 pm (EST)
Aircraft chasing wolves to the point of exhaustion, and then landing and shooting animals no longer able to run can hardly be claimed to be a necessary part of predator control. In addition, most aerial wolf hunting in Alaska is done by rich urbanites, who may or may not be Alaska residents. The push for this type of hunt by the governor and other politicians may be fueled more by the money it brings into the state, than concerns for predator control. She spent $400,000 to promote the practice in the weeks before a vote to outlaw it.

A raft of scientists has argued that Palin has provided little evidence that the current program of systematically killing wolves, estimated at a population of 7,000 to 11,000, will result in more moose for hunters. State estimates of moose populations have come under scrutiny. Some wildlife biologists say predator control advocates don't even understand what wolves eat and are concerned that her methods are endangering both wolves and moose.

She is undaunted by facts and ignores the long held understanding dating to the 1920s that wolves are important to Alaska's ecology. She introduced legislation that would transfer authority over the program from the state Department of Fish and Game to Alaska's Board of Game, whose members are appointed by her, so that she would not have to deal with those who question her will. This is how she operates.

Palin edits science to support her personal views. She questions global warming and has endorsed teaching creationism is public schools. In my opinion, Palin is ruthless and wedded to ideology over information. This is a dangerous combination.
catlover26
#8. catlover26 on 02/05/2009 - 11:55 pm (EST)
i don't even like sarah palin and i think what she is doing is so wrong, wolves are beautiful animals and she needs to stop killing them.....
roylj
#9. roylj on 02/06/2009 - 2:06 am (EST)
I believe Governor Palin is probably right, and Ashley Judd should stick to show business. Wildlife management is the job of the Department of Natural Resources of the respective state, and it is their job to keep a balance of predators and prey. Alaska is probably the only state where it makes sense to harvest part of the wolf population.
CM-JJordan
#10. CM-JJordan on 02/06/2009 - 1:15 pm (EST)
A very good point my friend brought up last night - why don't they just transport the wolves instead of kill them? There's an idea that doesn't involve murder.

 


Betty Boutique