home | welcome! login | register | help

Join Now!

The BettyConfidential Network
Betty Boutique

Mean Betty

Should We Stop Reporting On Octo-Mom?

As porn companies battle over Octo-mom, we wonder if it's time to put a lid on it

-Mean Betty

Nadya Suleman pornHmmmm ... a chance to prove ourselves holier than thou vs. continued expression of shock and awe at the ever-fascinating (and seemingly endless) Octo-mom saga. Decisions, decisions!

On one hand, being a lady of class and virtue, Mean Betty does concede that entertainment reporter Billy Bush has a point. Oh, did you miss that? Allow Mean Betty to illuminate! According to Billy (paragon of journalistic integrity), Access Hollywood (paragon of straight-news reporting) is no longer going to report on the antics of one Nadya Suleman. After wrapping up a juicy little tidbit about Lindsay Lohan and Samantha Ronson's latest spat, Billy announced:

"Before we go, let me tell you why going forward we are not going to cover the octo-mom: It's gross ... Now some of our illustrious media are showcasing smackdowns and faceoffs with Nadya and her mom while denying that they have paid her big money to do this. If they have, it's just short-term money in her hands. If octo-mom makes news with a movie of the week or reality show, heaven forbid, we might just have to report it. We will not reward it."

Now, that does give Mean Betty pause. Are we rewarding Octo-mom for her outrageous and unconscionable behavior? Are we merely adding fuel to the fire that keeps Nadya and her wacked-out parents in the national spotlight, thus allowing her to profit from her publicity?

What do YOU think, dear readers ... should we stop writing about this story? CAN WE POSSIBLY RESIST???

Well, you mull that over for a bit dears, but, since we're here anyway ... we might as well make a day out of it and give you the latest. We can solemnly swear that NO money is changing hands here - not even enough for one measly little acrylic fill.

Surely you heard yesterday that Nadya had been offered $1 million to star in a porn by Vivid Entertainment -- and they'll throw in health benefits if she become a "contract girl." Well, there's certainly a vivid thought. Now, TMZ (bless their black little hearts) has obtained a letter from Pink Visual, a RIVAL PORN COMPANY "WITH A CONSCIENCE" who is offering Nadya a year's supply of diapers if she turns down Vivid's offer.

Mean Betty begs you ... could Jerry Springer MAKE THIS UP?

As Pink Visual so solemnly warns, if Nadya accepts the porn offer, she "will become the subject of endless ridicule and scorn."

Heavens, we wouldn't want that to happen!

Meanwhile, of course, Dr. Phil has jumped into the mix, giving The Early Show  a taste of his upcoming interview (tune in Thursday!) with the woman he cleverly assesses as being "a very confused young woman."

His opinion:

" ... The best option is to try and work out a solution in place. And that means that we can't turn our back on these 14 innocent children. I think she needs money, I think she needs volunteer manpower, I think she needs some of the corporate folks that often step up, whether it's diaper companies, baby food companies, those sorts of things, to say, 'I'm not going to turn my back on the 14 children.'"

Dearies, one thing is certain. Nadya Suleman is the gift that will keep on giving as far as the media industry is concerned. What does that say about our culture, our society? Who knows ... Mean Betty can't answer that question (she's too busy wondering what will happen next ... a Playboy offer? A marriage proposal from Joe Francis? Is anything too bizarre to contemplate?).

But she does know that Page Six's Cindy Adams hit the nail on the head this morning when she said, "Come sweeps, we'll see that Octo-mom's octopuss all over TV."

Mean Betty sure will be tuned in ... will you? And, yes, she hates herself, too.

Get more BettyConfidential! Follow us on Twitter,
Friend us on Facebook, and Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter!


rate this article!rated 3.69/5 (13 Votes)
15 comment(s) on this article...
NinaL
#1. NinaL on 02/26/2009 - 2:03 pm (EST)
Unfortunately she is benefiting from all this publicity, but I don't think you should refrain from covering the excesses and heinousness because this story has a lot to tell us about our society.
stacymomof3
#2. stacymomof3 on 02/26/2009 - 3:21 pm (EST)
I'm sick of hearing about this girl. And have no interest in what or who is offering her sicko deals. She's WT and I'd rather not know what people like this are doing. It makes me sick to my stomach!!!
Rosewood
#3. Rosewood on 02/26/2009 - 4:24 pm (EST)
Ocot-mom is getting exactly what she wanted- uber publicity and fame. We all know that the money will follow. Why not just let sleeping dogs lie- pun intended.
bryony1
#4. bryony1 on 02/26/2009 - 6:04 pm (EST)
Remove all 14 children and push this woman back into the darkness from which she emerged to birth her litter in the spotlight of public knowledge. Arrest her for child abuse and neglect, give her court-ordered psychiatric evaluations, and give those babies decent homes where love and attention can be lavished on them. All of this should be done outside the public realm. The main thing is care of all the children in the miasmic conditions under which they must be existing while their breeder fails so miserably in her Angelina Jolie imitation. Scrape her off the pages of the newspapers and the screens of the TV and Internet.
Lavish love and attention on each child, not on its mother. It's past time to tie her tubes so she can't grab the limelight again at more babies' expense. Let her become a pornography queen, although why any pornographer in her/his right mind would want to film all those stretch marks bewilders me. Maybe the positioning of genitalia all day afflicts these "filmmakers" with neuroses as bad, if different, from those of the litter-bearer they're wooing. Let them work things out after the entire group of children is safe and secure and keep her out of legit and even marginally legit news.
bryony1
#5. bryony1 on 02/26/2009 - 6:09 pm (EST)
p.s. My error. She doesn't need her tubes tied; she needs a hysterectomy. Sorry.
Linda864
#6. Linda864 on 02/26/2009 - 6:11 pm (EST)
It would be my hope that child protective services are investigating the home that not only the older 6 children live in, but will be home to the octuplets. I also think that the doctor that insiminated Nadya should be investigated for unethical practices.
roylj
#7. roylj on 02/26/2009 - 8:48 pm (EST)
1. Hysterectomy. 2. Put the kids in decent homes. 3. Let her become a porn star if she wants so she earns proper (dis)respect. 4. Report on the kids, and let her "news" go to porn publications or whatever. I don't want to hear about her!
bryony1
#8. bryony1 on 02/26/2009 - 9:22 pm (EST)
Why do we read and comment about her if we don't want to hear about her? I'm as guilty as anyone else, as sick of her as anyone else -- so what's our fascination? Is it because this is so unusual a situation? Are the original children from the same background, six-at-one-go? If not, and they are left in her care, I really pity those older kids, because they'll be doing all the work while she's "in school." (Does anyone really believe "schooling" is her goal?)
daym1
#9. daym1 on 02/26/2009 - 10:30 pm (EST)
I honestly know that I am not watching for any other reason than to hopefully find that the babies have all been taken away from her. They are adorable and they need good homes! Having seen where the other 6 are being raised, I cannot imagine how it will look if she has 8 more! I don't care if she does buy a million dollar house, she still is a horrible mother. If it hadn't been for the grandparents, the first 6 would be worse off than they are. She is not fit to raise a dog, let alone 14 children! She is just looking for another way to get a free handout so she can sit around on her big fanny and drink lattes and have her nails done. If she really loved her children so much, she would have spent every penny on them. Instead, she gets plastic surgery and personal items. She is so disgusting! I want to keep seeing what is happening because I am waiting for the day when I read that she is found unfit to raise the babies and they are removed. Then I could care less what she does or who?
justme
#10. justme on 02/27/2009 - 1:07 pm (EST)
this is disgusting,people in California are expected to support this woman with our taxes. How is supporting someone who abused fertilization drugs (after already having 6 children she could obviously not support) any different than funding a group of drug addicts medical bills and clean needle fund while they continue using? This is what our economy has come too, supporting selfish irresponsible people via welfare. Its nice to know that the social security money I work for and am never going to see, is going to the 13th and 14th children of a mother who doesn't even work. She was feeding the first few by splitting food stamps equivalent to $4-5.

 


Share this Article...
bettyTalk about itbettyTalk e-mail to a Friendemail to a friend submit to Facebookfacebook Digg it!digg
submit to StumbleUponstumbleupon tweet on Twittertwitter Add to del.icio.us!del.icio.us submit to Yahoo! buzzY! buzz add to kirtsyKirtsy

top of page jump to top